CIO: Five ways to save money on your cloud costs

Keeping track of your monthly cloud computing bills isn’t easy. While it is great that cloud providers usually charge you on the resources you consume, the various elements of your bill are very complex and made up of dozens of different factors, such as CPU core, storage units, RAM size and data transfers. Fortunately, there are a number of online services (see chart below) that can help you save money by using a series of clever choices. In this article for CIO (email reg. req.), I will look at five questions that you can ask to try to reduce your monthly cloud computing bill.

Service, link Number of Cloud Providers Expertise Free or paid?
Cloudability AWS Cost monitoring Paid
Cloudorado Cloud Hosting Comparison 27 CPU benchmarks Free (paid by participating vendors)
Cloudyn AWS, Azure, Google Costing trends Both
CloudHarmony CloudSquare 101 Uptime status Free
CloudSpectator Varies Custom analytics Both; paid reports are $400 each
CloudHealth Technologies AWS, Google Costing, performance and security analytics Paid services start at $250/mo
Datapipe Analytics AWS, Azure Management tools Paid services start at $3500/mo
RightScale PlanForCloud 6 Deployment scenarios Both; paid services start at $6000/mo

 

 

Network World: 7 encrypted email services to hide your messages

Whether you think Ed Snowden is a patriot or a traitor or somewhere in between, it certainly has been an interesting couple of years in the secure email business. It is a continued series of ironies, starting with the fact that Snowden had trouble convincing his chosen scribes to make use of encrypted email technology itself to transmit his documents. As I wrote about earlier this year, since Snowden’s revelations, more people have been motivated to employ encryption than ever before.

Ironically, it seems that the type of encryption that you use can make you a target of the spy agencies, who can scoop up your transmissions and figure out your origins. As Bruce Schneier said in a post last year, “There’s nothing that screams “hack me” more than using specially designed al Qaeda encryption software.”

That is a scary thought. But I don’t want to debate this here; instead I wanted to take a closer look at both new and older email encryption technologies and how much they actually protect your communications.

tutanota outlook betterI took this two-year mark of Snowden’s unintended flight to Russia to write this review of seven different products for Network World. They include Hushmail, ProtonMail, Datamotion SecureMail, HP’s Voltage SecureMail, Tutanota, Virtru and AppRiver. Using one of them will certainly be better than not using any encryption, even if it raises your profile with certain three-lettered agencies. Tutanova’s Outlook plug-in is pictured above.

You can read my full review here.

Tom’s Hardware: Bitdefender’s Box not recommended

IMG_0008When Bitdefender announced its Box, a new breed of security hardware, I was intrigued. It sadly over-reaches and isn’t quite ready for prime time, will be only useful in a very limited number of circumstances, and falls far short of being the kind of unique protective appliance that it promised.

It is a very unusual product: basically, it supplies the DHCP addresses in conjunction with your existing home router. But getting that combination to work reliability wasn’t pretty, and took weeks of effort too.

You can read my review in Tom’s Hardware today here.

Network World: Centrify tops the group of 7 SSO products

Since we last looked at single sign-on products in 2012, the field has gotten more crowded and more capable. A number of new vendors have come to ply their wares, and a number of old vendors have been acquired or altered their products.

Centrify admin dashbdFor this round of evaluations, we looked at seven SSO services: Centrify’s Identity Service (the overall winner who’s dashboard is pictured above), Microsoft’s Azure AD Premium, Okta’s Identity and Mobility Management, OneLogin, Ping Identity’s Ping One, Secure Auth’s IdP, and SmartSignin. In addition to these products, we also looked briefly at AVG’s Business SSO. Overall, products have expanded their authentication support, moving towards integrated mobile device management,  using more cloud-based solutions, and supporting more apps. You can read here the entire text of my review, published today.

Hyper-Converged Storage from DataCore Virtual SAN Software

DataCore’s comprehensive storage services stack has long been known for harnessing ultra-fast processors and RAM caches in x86 servers, for superior performance and enterprise-class availability. It now comes in a compact, hyper-converged package that is ideal for transactional databases and mixed workloads. DataCore Virtual SAN software is available for a free 30-day trial. It runs on any hypervisor and your choice of standard servers.

We tested DataCore Virtual SAN in May 2015.

Pricing:  DataCore-authorized solution providers offer software packages starting under $10,000 for a two-node, high-availability cluster, including annual 24×7 support.
Requirements: Windows Server 2012 R2

For information on DataCore’s SANsymphony-V Software-defined Storage Platform, check out our other video here.

And for a copy of our white paper on hyper-converged storage, download our paper here.

 

Network World: Five cloud costing tools reviewed

Certainly, using a cloud provider can be cheaper than purchasing your own hardware, or instrumental in moving a capital expense into an operating one. And there are impressive multi-core hyperscale servers that are now available to anyone for a reasonable monthly fee. But while it is great that cloud providers base their fees on what resources you actually consume, the various elements of your bill are daunting and complex, to say the least.

Separating pricing fact from fiction isn’t easy. For this article, we looked at five shopping comparison services, including Cloudorado, CloudHarmony’s CloudSquare, CloudSpectator, Datapipe and RightScale’s PlanForCloud.com. Some of them cover a lot of providers, some only focus on a few.

You can read the full review in Network World today here.

CDW StateTech Magazine: Review of Citrix XenMobile

xenmobile1Citrix has long offered mobile device management software in cloud and on-premises versions. The latest version, XenMobile 10, offers some welcome enhancements to the user experience and security. In my review for CDW’s State Tech Magazine, I walk through some of the notable features. Citrix sells three different software bundles under its XenMobile brand: XenMobile MDM, XenMobile App and XenMobile Enterprise editions.There are differences that you should be aware of.

Network World review: Portnox, Extreme lead NAC pack

portnox NAC overview2Remember when network access control (NAC) was all the rage? Remember the competing standards from Microsoft, Cisco, and the Trusted Computing Group? Back around 2006, there were dozens of NAC products, many of which turned out to be buggy and difficult to implement.

But NAC hasn’t disappeared. In fact, NAC products have evolved and improved as well. I reviewed Enterasys/Extreme Networks Mobile IAM, Hexis Cyber Solutions NetBeat NAC, Impulse Point SafeConnect NAC, Pulse Policy Secure, and Portnox NAC. Overall, Portnox (above) was tops.

You can read my full review in Network World here.

Network World: Uptime simplifies system and server monitoring

uptimeServer and systems management tools have long been too expensive and too complex to actually use without spending thousands of dollars on consultants. Uptime Software has been trying to change that with a product that can be installed and useful within an hour. I tested the latest version (7.3.1) on a small network of Windows physical and virtual machines in a review that was published on Network World today. 

The screenshot above is an example of Uptime’s dashboard, and is filled with all sorts of actionable information, and is completely customizable.

Network World: Six Unified Threat Management Units Reviewed

The world of unified threat management appliances continues to evolve. In my 2013 UTM review, I looked at units from Check Point Software (which topped the ratings), Dell/Sonicwall, Elitecore Technologies’ Cyberoam, Fortinet, Juniper Networks, Kerio Technologies, Sophos, and Watchguard Technologies.

This year I reviewed the Calyptix AccessEnforcer AE800, Check Point Software’s 620, Dell/Sonicwall’s NSA 220 Wireless-N, Fortinet’s FortiWiFi-92D, Sophos’ UTM SG125 and Watchguard Technologies’ Firebox T10-W (pictured below). With the exception of Calyptix, the other five are all in Gartner’s “leader” quadrant of their latest UTM report. We contacted other vendors including Cisco, Juniper and Netgear, but they declined to participate. In addition, Sophos has purchased the Cyberoam line and will combine its features with its existing UTM products sometime next year.

WG ROGUE ap detectionOverall, the market has slowly evolved more than had any big revolutionary changes. Products are getting better in terms of features and price/performance. All six of these units will do fine for securing small offices of 25 people.

You can read the review here, check out a slideshow of the screenshots of typical features here, and watch a short (two minute) screencast video summarizing the major points of the review here.