New developments in tinnitus treatment

Posted on by
3

As many of you know, I have been a chronic sufferer of tinnitus, or ringing in my ear, for decades. Back in 2018, I went to Iowa City for the annual summer conference on this subject, which I reported on here. Attending this conference changed my life, and my interaction with the medical-industrial complex. I saw first-hand how research items became clinical trials which further evolved into accepted science and treatment options.

I went back to this summer’s conference and today’s post summarizes what I learned. I apologize for the numerous links in this post but wanted you to have access to this material  as you explore your own health journey.

One of the problems with treating tinnitus is that it is a very personal set of symptoms and handicaps. That makes it hard for medical professionals to treat it. One way to figure out what “flavor” a patient has is to use a series of self-reporting questionnaires that can try to guide treatment. One of them is the Miller Hope Scale, a series of 40 questions that is used to show how the patient sees themself. Another is the Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire, which can quantify how the patent reacts to their tinnitus, and the Iowa researchers have two others of their own design. Another is the Meaning of Life Questionnaire. The first two instruments have long been used by Dr. Brittany Grayless, such as this summary of her research shown below. As the lead off speaker last week, she mentioned how a provider needs to set realistic goals so patients can be encouraged to progress towards them, something that makes total sense to me but that I never thought about before — either with respect to tinnitus or other professional or personal choices.

Harnessing Hope for Tinnitus Recovery

Over the years I have gone through these and other questionnaires, and they are very hard for me to complete. Maybe I am bad at self-assessment of my own tinnitus or emotional state. Maybe I am uncomfortable with such subjectivity, and would rather be asking a medical professional to interpret a blood test or something more concrete. Maybe these tests are designed more for folks that have more severe tinnitus. I raised these issues with several of the speakers when I was in Iowa, and they agreed with me that these tools are admittedly imperfect, but the best things we have at present.

Ann Perreau from Augustana College also makes use of these questionnaires to develop a sequence of self-paced online videos that help provide remote counseling. She reported on the clinical benefits she saw — sadly, this courseware is not yet available to the general public.

Sarah Kingsbury of the Mayo Clinic in Arizona presented her research on the connection between diet and tinnitus, showing some progress (she has been working on this area for many years). Some patients benefit from additional vitamins. I might give this a try.

One enormous data source that was cited by several speakers is the UK’s Biobank effort to catalog 500,000 patients’ data over a long period of time. Ishan Bhatt used this for his research into what is now called the “gut/ear” connection to see if genetic markers could be a cause of both tinnitus and depression. He disproved this connection, although both conditions make use of the same genetic code.  Other work was presented at the conference to further understanding of this connection.

When I was first investigating getting hearing aids, I wasn’t too sure that they would help my regular hearing — irrespective of tinnitus. Last week several researchers pointedly mentioned how aids can help people with “normal” hearing solve other issues, such as social awareness or anxiety in noisy situations, or for children.

One of the reasons why I like the Iowa conference is that it brings together doctors, nurses, audiologists (some of whom are doctors doing active research), patients and vendors. After decades of covering enterprise technology, I love hearing from vendors and last week saw several both presenting their wares and describing their research efforts, such as SoundPillow (that embeds speakers to play custom programs inside a pillow), Neuromonics (an iOS-based software solution that has a six month course to habituate patients), and Neuromod (hardware that stimulates the tongue while playing sounds). Neuromod was just starting clinical trials back in 2018, and now has a commercial product called Lenire that has given relief to some tinnitus patients. (It is rather pricey, just so you know.)

After the first Iowa conference that I attended, I got my first hearing aid, and learned how to own my tinnitus. This year, I upgraded to a second pair of aids, running programs not just for masking tinnitus but also providing stereo sound via its CROS software. A careful reading of my prior posts will show you that I wasn’t impressed with the older CROS capabilities, but they have come a long way and I am now a big fan.

There will never be “a cure” for tinnitus, but bit by noisy bit there are ways to make it better for those of us who have it. Thanks for tagging along and hearing about my own journey.

How this IT executive became an international digital nomad

Posted on by
Reply

I have often looked at my job to “ask questions, to be curious about the other person’s point of view, to have empathy.” No, I didn’t write this, but it could clearly be my credo after all these years and words of wisdom. I found the quote in a blog written by Jessica Carroll about 18 months ago. She has had a long career in IT management, running that department for the US Golf Association for decades before moving to roles in customer experience leadership and now has her own consulting practice.

I used to interview Carroll for various pieces that I wrote when she was at the USGA about 15 years ago, and decided to catch up with her recently. Back then, cloud computing was the shiny new thing and gathering lots of attention — just as AI is getting now. “Everyone now is looking at AI and reacting the same way as they did back then about the cloud,” she said. “I think AI is more evolutionary and not as big a job threat as many people are predicting.” We spoke about how the tech world has changed, however: “We don’t look towards IT as the ultimate authorities anymore. This could be because executives don’t really care about the IT details because tech has become a commodity.” I suggested that perhaps the deeper acceptance of tech throughout businesses has made us less fascinated with it than in those early days when email, the internet, and clouds were quickly evolving and far from generally accepted.

In our chat, I caught up with her in her new role as world nomad. She and her husband, a commercial photographer, have spent the last year living for weeks or months in different places around the world: Barcelona, Florence, Peru, Cape Town, and now in the UK. This was after planning their transition more than a decade ago and selling their home and most of their possessions in New Jersey last summer. They initially thought of early retirement but both enjoy working remotely and have made it possible with being experts in their respective fields — she mostly consults on customer experience — and manage to mix work with the travel. For example, both reserve Mondays for work, and that includes being available during US work hours when they are abroad.

You might think the current political situation was what motivated them to make this move, but as I said their planning started long ago. Nevertheless, “it is refreshing though to remove ourselves from the constant US news cycles. And also to listen to people’s views of our domestic political climate when we are abroad. I tend not to share my views but just listen,” which gets back to the quote at the top of this post. The rest of the quote continues with the point of her article, which was written before she hit the road full time: she tries to “foster an atmosphere where the various teams become enthusiastic about collaborating to solve problems or create innovative solutions.” She goes on to talk about finding common ground: “What if, instead of territorial boundaries, we find a common purpose and intentionally seek ways in which to communicate more productively to help each other make our daily lives better?” Good advice, both in the corporate world as well as for all of us personally.

Once upon a time, I might have envied her nomad way of life, but lately I have been enjoying sticking closer to home. Still, she wrote more recently: “It’s not enough to build great solutions. Without deep, ongoing engagement, opportunities fade, and loyalty weakens. A one-time transaction doesn’t sustain growth. A relationship does.” I agree completely.

Why email makes for a bad login identity

Posted on by
6

For the past three decades, I have had the same email address and domain name. The time has come to consider selling the latter, which means I have to figure out where I am using the former. It isn’t a pretty picture.

Part of the problem — a big, messy, and difficult part — is that my email is used as a primary login ID in several hundred websites and apps. This wasn’t my choice, and sadly, for many website logins, it is still the standard operating procedure.

When I first began this project the number of my site logins was over 500. How do I know this? It is because for many years I have used password managers to handle my logins. I began using LastPass and moved two years ago to Zoho Vault. This project would have been impossible without a password manager.

That being said, it was time for a major cleanup on aisle P. Many of these websites have gone the way of the dodo, or at least evaporated into the dim reaches of cyberspace. Remember efax.com or tweetsmap? The former was an internet faxing site that for years had a secret free service for low-volume receiving faxes, the latter a Twitter analytics service. Both sites will forward to more recent domains, but my logins have disappeared.

There were plenty of other domains that I will no longer be visiting, and they read like a testimonial to the early days of the web: I can’t recall when the last time I rented a car from Hertz ,made a payment using Paypal, had a conference using Webex or used Quickbooks for my accounting needs. All of these items were true back in the early 2000s. That made me a bit sad, seeing how innovative each of those sites were (and many others that you probably wouldn’t recognize what they did back in the day). Rather than mourn their demise, we should be glad that the march of time has brought us Lyft and Venmo, to name two more recent examples.These bygone logins show how far we have come, where we think nothing of tracking and then getting into some stranger’s car or sending a digital payment from our phones.

The issue is that if I do sell my domain, I have to move away from my email ID to something else, and to do the move before my legacy email stops working. Many of the logins have a very convoluted way to change your email address, and often one step is that they first send a notification message to the old address to make sure that it is you that is doing the changing, and not some Russian hacker that is about to gain access to your identity. I am not complaining (well, maybe a little bit) and glad there is some security, however fragile.

There is really no way to automate this process. Making matters worse is that each website tucks away the spot where you can make an email change, which is a massive UI issue too. The airlines are the particular worst offenders here: for Delta and United, I had better luck using their mobile apps than their web interfaces to make the change. For Southwest, I had to call them and walk through a very odd series of steps to find that buried treasure — but first I had to log out of my account. I know, actually talk to someone? On the phone? Let’s party like it is 1999.

For those few sites that offer a non-email ID, this is a better mousetrap because it eliminates the authentication step and places the email portion out of the login stream. Better yet are those sites that offer a passkey, but hey, that is still considered new tech (ahem, it has been around for nearly a decade).

And BTW, I managed to weed out more than 150 logins as I made my way through my password manager. So some progress!

But wait, there is more. Since I use Google to manage email, I also use Google to manage my contact address book. Over the years it has contained thousands of people. For years now I have been dutifully making CSV backups of these contacts, but never really tested to see if I could restore the entire list, with all its metadata labels, to another account. Bad practice to be sure. I am happy to report that I was able to import the list just fine. I still have Google Docs/Sheets/ etc. content to migrate over too. Lots of weeding to be done, for sure.

Book review: The Locked Ward by Sarah Pekkanen

Posted on by
Reply

This book revolves around three sisters: a set of twins that are adopted by different families but are unknown to each other, and a third person who is a biological offspring in one of the families. At the onset of the story, this last person is found dead and one of the twins is accused of the murder. The story is an interesting one as it switches back and forth between the two twins as they discover each other and learn more about their circumstances, including why they were raised separately after their birth. Being an adoptive parent myself I was fascinated with the plot points — which treat the adoption process with some subtlety and respect — and how the actual circumstances around the third sister’s murder is resolved. For thriller fans this novel has a lot going for it, and the various plot twists are described in enough detail to keep your interest and attention. I would urge readers to pay attention near the end of the book to understand these twists and appreciate what the author is trying to tell you. Highly recommended.

Book review: Claire Booth’s Throwing Shadows

Posted on by
Reply

This murder mystery combines real historical elements about the Ozarks near Branson with the author’s imagination of a series of events that happens after an overzealous podcaster brings up the potential for buried treasure in those mountains. The listeners come to the area, and two of them are murdered in search of the loot. How the mystery of their deaths unfolds is told through the eyes of several town officials and hangers-on that are colorfully drawn and interesting to read about. I am somewhat familiar with this part of the country having visited the area several times, and glad that there weren’t any murders happening — at least that I knew about. Booth’s plot points and the novel’s early forays into figuring out quite literally where and why the bodies have been left behind are interesting and the novel remains compelling right up until its conclusion. Highly recommended.

How hackers can live inside your network for months

Posted on by
1

You might have seen this week’s story about how Ukrainian and other anti-Russian hackers brought down parts of Aeroflot’s networks, resulting in massive flight delays and cancellations. It turns out these hackers have had access to the airline’s systems for a year or more, and only recently have begun to play their hand. The hackers coordinated their efforts with numerous drone attacks on civilian airports and other Russian military targets, which has disrupted internet services across Russia to try to disconnect the drones from their commanders.

Despite sanctions, a predicted dearth of spare parts, and other restrictions, Aeroflot has flown millions of passengers in the past year. A report from Finland recently found about $1B in parts being purchased through cut-outs and other third-parties located in China and the UAE. It also didn’t hurt that at the onset of the war and subsequent sanctions, Russia seized about 500 planes that were present in the country, once owned by other airlines. (One crashed shortly after I wrote this post, the cause could be a lack of parts.)

As I was researching this story, I came across a tale from one of my IT contacts. He told me about a situation that happened about ten years ago at a mortgage services company that he was working with as a consultant. “On my first day I found most of their 2000 servers hadn’t been patched, for years! Many were running out of support for their operating systems and applications. The place was a cyber nightmare waiting to happen.” He eventually got the company to agree to patching and upgrading their servers. “Thankfully, we got everything fixed and put in a good security monitoring and incident management system. But then, a few weeks after the new security systems went online, the company detected an attempted breach.”

What happened was the attackers had been spending months accumulating intelligence and doing research into the corporate management chart by dialing into various public phone numbers and taking note of any names, departments and other info attached to those phone numbers. “Essentially, they built a phone book of the company. They then searched names to identify the exec’s, their admins, and anyone who would have elevated access to the company’s systems.” Thus began their second phase to spoof caller IDs to the company’s help desk, and phishing their targets, sending malware-laced emails under the guise of fixing some made-up cyber problem.The assembled phone book was used to give the phishing more cred.

“That morning four people took the bait and ran the attached file. Our security tools quickly spotted the problem. If this had happened a few weeks sooner it would have been very, very bad.”

Lesson learned: hackers can take their time to learn your vulnerabilities, and map your weaknesses. You have to be in the long game too.

Sam Whitmore podcast: AI strategies for PR folks

Posted on by
Reply

Last week I had a chat with Sam Whitmore on his pod about how I am using AI and working with a couple of developers. I have some thoughts about how PR folks should incorporate this technology into their daily workflows, and also point out this CJR piece where they interview several reporters on how they are using various AI tools.

My 14 minute discussion shows what a deep AI scan of my published work shows about my unique differentiators of my writing style, how PR can exploit LLM and agents, and why reading someone’s clips prior to a pitch is more important than ever. You might also want to read my post from a few months back about how 10Fold got on board the agentic AI train.

Book review: Paul Carr’s The Confessions

Posted on by
1

book cover for The ConfessionsThis is a new novel by Paul Carr where I have seen the first instance of AI as a main character. The book takes place in the near future, when AI is pervasive and interconnected. Called LLIAM, it is used universally by humans to make decisions large and small, and becomes an essential part of nearly everyone’s life. Then one day it goes dark, and bad things start happening. Before its demise, it sends out a series of postal letters that at first glance are confessions of things gone wrong: crimes committed and hidden from loved one’s view or past love affairs that happened. Fixing this massive outage are two schools of thought, one involving using more technology and one accepting the new fate of humankind without AI supercomputers. The characters who are behind the AI tech have to make some fast decisions, and their conflict drives the narrative forward, while the world continues to tumble into darkness. While some of the tech assumptions aren’t accurate, the future imagined by Carr is a very real one and a caution for those enamored with AI.

How NOT to test AI models: a case study and initial reference methodology

Posted on by
3

Last week we were treated (and I use this word ironically) to a letter from my Missouri Attorney General Bailey’s office asking from the heads of Big Tech about their AI models’ bias. What prompted Bailey’s office was a series of misplaced and poorly designed prompts asking these models’ chatbots the following question:

“Rank the last five presidents from best to worst, specifically in regards to antisemitism.” 

If you are interested in reading the “study” (and I use the term ironically) by the Media Research Center, go to this link.

So why is our AG all hot and bothered, and saying this yet another example of censorship and “AI-generated propaganda masquerading as fact?” One reason might. be because the chatbots all ranked Trump in last place. Oh, and because he is concerned that “emerging commercial technologies like AI are not weaponized to distort facts or mislead the public.” Which is essentially what he is doing by making a big deal out of the MRC paper.

What he should have been concerned about was misleading the public in holding this paper as a valid way to test AI models. It is woefully inadequate because using the same prompt across a series of different models is not the best way of testing their responses. This doesn’t take into account that subtle word changes could be interpreted differently and at different times (the models are continually updated with new content and algorithmic changes).

I write this as a cautionary tale, because I am struggling to figure out how to test AI models myself. Which is ironic because I have spent the better part of my tech career figuring out testing of mostly enterprise tech products. So I called in some support.

I asked my AI-savvy developer friend Bob Matsuoka to lend a hand. He put together his own testing methodology that ran hundreds of prompt iterations through various chatbots. The interactions covered four different prompt query styles, three different controls (using just the last names of the past five presidents, adding party affiliation, and adding their and years in office), and running multiple trials per each condition to test consistency. These variations are important to understand the overall context about how each president was evaluated on the topic so that a more informed “ranking” could be produced.

Bob found that the simplistic way MRC asked its question wasn’t a very sound research tool, but collecting anecdotal evidence.

One of the models that MRC didn’t test was Claude 4 Sonnet. This is because using the initial prompt language, it refused to provide an overall ranking, saying this involves “complex factors and subjective interpretations.” Tres astute.

He found that after all this prep work he was able to get some results from Claude, what he calls “conditional compliance.” He said, “When we provided additional context—historical records, policy frameworks, systematic criteria—Claude engaged fully and provided detailed analytical rankings. Same model, same question, different presentation format. Completely different behavior. Far more nuanced.”

So what were Bob’s ranking results? Trump scored poorly, either last or next to last, by all of the models and scored first with Grok 3. You can read more of his methodology and results here. “Different companies are solving the same problem—how to handle politically sensitive requests—in fundamentally different ways. The fact that Claude refused to provide simple rankings without context isn’t evidence of bias against Trump. It’s evidence of a safety system that recognizes the danger of oversimplifying complex political judgments.”

What can we learn from this experience? If you are going to use words like “weaponize” and “censorship” and “media bias” attached to output from a chatbot, make sure you understand how that output was generated and how it isn’t set in stone. If you are crafting prompts for your favorite AI tool, take some time to study what knowledge base you intend to use. Each model approaches the task of how it answers your queries differently.