AT&T USBConnect Mercury laptop broadband adapter card

The idea of going wireless anywhere – not just where you have WiFi – is appealing. And the adapter cards keep getting better. I tried out this 3G card from AT&T on both Windows XP SP2 and SP3 machines – with SP2 you’ll need two reboots to get everything installed. Near the business end of the connector is the SIM card that enables it to work with the AT&T network. The speeds are much better than the 3G connection on my iPhone, with the claims from AT&T of 700-1400 kbps down and 500-1200 kbps uploads about twice what I observed on my 3G iPhone. One oddity – it didn’t like the tracert command in Windows but could do command line FTP transfers just fine. There is also a simplified text messaging application so you can compose texts and send them on the computer keyboard.

If you need on-the-go Web surfing and email, this is a solid product, once you get past the installation. Macs use a different connection manager that comes directly from Sierra Wireless (the makers of the adapter), while Windows uses one that has some added features to help you make free use of AT&T WiFi hot spots. The initial cost of the card is rebated if you get a two-year data plan. If you don’t, the upfront cost is $250. Either way, you still have to pay $60 a month, which includes a 5 GB monthly usage cap before you get charged on additional usage —  so if you are going to be transferring a lot of files, this may not be the solution for you. 

CIOupdate: Why you need to outsource your test lab

Corporate IT shops that need to roll out new network, infrastructure and Internet applications or who have to make expensive equipment upgrades are increasingly turning towards independent test labs as part of their decision process. The labs can help identify weak points, application bottlenecks, design flaws, and show-stopping bugs in a non-production environment, and are also useful “bake-offs” to pit potential candidates against each other in controlled scenarios that can mimic their eventual use. And these days there are several outsourced labs that are available from a number of small to large-scale providers (see chart below).

Outsourced Independent Test Labs

Lab Location, URL Specialization
Opus One Tucson, AZ

opus1.com

Network security applications
Platform Lab Columbus, OH

platformlab.org

Infrastructure and Web applications
Extreme Labs Indianapolis, IN

extremelabs.com

Servers, networked applications
Applabs Lindon, UT*

applabs.com

Storage networks, eCommerce, 1000 PCs
West Coast Labs Irvine, CA*

westcoastlabs.org

Network security and communications applications
Neohapsis Chicago, IL

neohapsis.com

Network infrastructure, embedded systems, security products
Principled Technologies Durham, NC

principledtechnologies.com

Virtualization, thin clients
Network Test Thousand Oaks, CA

networktest.com

Network infrastructure performance and usability measurement

* Other offices outside of the US as well.

Why go with an outsourced lab? The two biggest reasons are expertise and resources. “Some IT shops do have the testing expertise, but they don’t always have the time to set up a test given the press of daily operations,” says Joel Snyder, senior partner of Opus One in Tucson, Ariz. “It is often better to bring someone in who does testing as part of their daily job.” And the specialized test gear is more than a bunch of PCs on a gigabit switch. “We have all sorts of test equipment here,” says David Newman, director of Network Test in Thousand Oaks, Calif. “Most enterprises don’t have specialized test instruments such as the Spirent Test Center that can emulate millions of routes and generate billions of packets. They could rent the tools but they probably don’t have the expertise to use them. Network testing is not a core competence for many IT organizations.” And Greg Shipley, the CTO of Neohapsis in Chicago says, “There are still specialized skills, test plans, environment preparation, environment validation, and a slew of other components necessary to do world-class testing that are not usually found in abundance in corporate IT departments.”

Testing can also avoid potential show-stopping issues with a roll out. “We did a test for global logistics company and found incredible poor performance of a IBM ISS security appliance,” says Snyder. “It turns out that they were sending traffic over a well known port that ISS expected to see something else and didn’t know how to decode the traffic. We fixed the configuration of the ISS box and saved our client a lot of grief had they put this into production without doing any testing.”

“The Ohio Secretary of State came to us because they expected a great deal of load on their Web site on election night and wanted to validate that they wouldn’t experience any problems,” says Steve Gruetter, the director of Platform Labs in Columbus, Ohio. “They had made a complete revision of their infrastructure since the 2004 election and had not done any type of load/stress testing. We lined up a consultant who helped them design a test with our hardware, software and bandwidth and found that they could handle nearly three times the load of 2004 with about the same amount of bandwidth, and they did fine on the night of the election.”

“Organizations will often come at product evaluations differently,” says Shipley. “Some want help assessing features and functionality, others are looking for help with performance testing, others are looking at the security of the product itself. Some want little more than helping define their evaluation criteria, where others want help with all of the above.”

Here are a few tips to consider when shopping for a test lab:

If technical criteria matter for your purchase, make sure you understand what they are before you put together your test plan. “When the time comes to deploy a product, you have to prove that you didn’t make a big mistake. Even so, most people don’t usually buy products solely on technical criteria,” says Snyder.

Understand what testing for performance really means, and what are the boundaries of acceptable and unacceptable performance before you set up your test plan. “Have clear goals going into tests. Don’t change objectives during the project, says Newman.

— Know what the facility specializes in, and what the actual lab testers’ expertise is before you hire them. This is just common sense, but each test lab has a different specialization as well as size and facilities. They range in size from the one-person Network Test to the multi-office global companies of Applabs and West Coast Labs.

Some, like Network Test, do more performance-related tests, while Opus One specializes in firewall and Virtual Private network devices. ExtremeLabs has deep expertise in network and Internet applications: “One of the most difficult tests we had to do was to simulate 200,000 DNS requests a second, all with different source IP and MAC addresses,” says Tom Henderson the managing director of ExtremeLabs, Inc. based in Indianapolis, Ind. “We found a flaw that the developer fixed within a few days.” They also work in virtualization consolidation scenarios, where a company wants to migrate their physical servers to virtual ones and understand what the resulting configuration, load, and performance will be.

Platform Lab doesn’t actually conduct the testing – it is a state-funded facility and will connect clients with the appropriate consultants to perform the tests. “We just setup the hardware, software, and bandwidth to their specs. While we don’t do the tests ourselves, we have relationships with 125 consulting firms,” says Gruetter. And Applabs does a lot of work in storage area networks testing and stress testing eCommerce Web sites.

— Know what equipment, bandwidth, and test gear you need. If you want a large collection of actual PCs (versus virtual machine instances) to do your tests, the best place to start is with Applabs facility in Utah. They have 1,000 individual PCs that can run automation software for their tests – the other labs use virtual machines or synthetic test tools to simulate client and server loads. “We are the only game in town,” says Doc Parghi, the senior VP for North America for Applabs. “The Utah test lab is a small part of our business and we have many other services, too. We have a significant presence in the UK and the majority of your staff is in India where we do automation and regression testing.” Wherever you go, you should find out what test gear the lab has and whether it will be appropriate or not for your needs.

— What kind of vendor support is expected during the actual test? “I often see that vendors don’t always send their A-list engineers though we are doing tests that may result in a purchase of tens of millions of dollars of their gear,” says Newman. “You just can’t send a junior field sales engineer who may not understand the business need or how to best deal with the flaws that we uncover during the tests, or the complexity of the application that we are testing.”

— What kind of audience will be reading the resulting reports? You also need to define whether a C-level executive will be reading the results, or will you need your own IT engineers to review the reports. “Sometimes our clients want recommendations, other time they are satisfied with just the raw results,” says Newman. A good strategy is to examine some writing samples before hiring, and most of the lab Web sites have links to download these or can send them on request. Applabs also can call on its own analysts that they can bring into a test evaluation too.

Finally, how much is this going to cost? Each lab prices their services differently, and getting an estimate might take some work. For example, the Columbus Platform Lab charges ala carte for bandwidth, machine usage and other items, such as renting any test equipment. They charge clients based on a formula of $12/MB per day of testing. But since they have access to some very large Internet pipes, up to gigabit Ethernet speeds, that can get expensive if a client wants a lot of bandwidth for their tests. Network Test wouldn’t quote any prices, but they include all test gear, bandwidth, and equipment as part of their fee. ExtremeLabs charges $3,500 a day with a four-day minimum. Opus One charges $2,000 a day.

Back to the future with Windows NT

To start off the new year right, I decided to go back in time and see what I could learn from running an ancient (by computing standards, anyway) operating system and software combination. To appreciate how far we have come (or not), and to see whether I could actually get real work done. The idea came about from some conversations that Jason Perlow and I had. Jason is a fellow blogger and IT consultant who now works for IBM. He and I at one point in our lives (although not at the same time) lived in Port Washington, N.Y. and spent a lot of time with OS/2, but don’t let that influence you.

I picked NT v4 as my starting place. This operating system is more than ten years old, and was probably the last OS that Microsoft created that had some real simplicity to it. To get an idea of the power of the OS, there are still many corporate servers running it, even though Microsoft has tried to stamp it out and turn off support and push people to upgrade to something more recent. To get around the driver issues and other challenges, I decided to set up a virtual machine running NT, and I am using VMware’s Fusion on my Mac (just to make it interesting).

Jason and I have the hypothesis that the OS doesn’t really matter anymore, and that if you can get beyond some of the issues with running older software and applications, you may find that an older OS is perfect for your needs. We also thought that running an ancient OS was a good way to see how far we have come with newer computers, and perhaps a way to extract some additional performance because the older OSs are smaller and theoretically could run faster on the newer PCs.

To get NT working properly, you need find versions of software either online or in someone’s attic that are not so old as to be useless. First off, I had to install Service Pack 6, and I also needed to install the right version of the SP too for the encryption level of the OS. You then install the VMware tools software, which supplies the drivers to get the most out of your machine. Then you install Microsoft Office 2000 – which is the most recent version of Office that will run on NT. I messed up by installing the tools package after Office, and VMware didn’t like that. Office 2000 has the unfortunate side effect of updating your NT version with an almost-working version of Internet Explorer v5. The reason I say almost-working is that you need another piece of software called the Windows Installer to get other software installed on this machine. I couldn’t get past this point, however.

I also put on Firefox v2.0.0.20 browser on the machine, which is a fairly recent version of the browser, but apparently not recent enough as I had some problems with certain Web sites. I had to update my Adobe Flash plug-in too. Finally, I added AIM v5.9, which is an older version of Instant Messenger software. Skype doesn’t have any version that will run on NT, which is too bad.

So what I found was that the VM version of NT was pretty snappy. It would boot from scratch in under 30 seconds, and faster still from the suspended VM state. I liked the old-fashioned Windows and the lack of glitz and raw simplicity of the controls. No Aero Glass junk for this OS! Another plus with using VMs is that you don’t have to worry about personal firewalls and anti-virus as much – you can set up a protected environment and keep it isolated from your host machine, which is good because most of the AV programs have stopped supporting NT a long time ago.

All of my Office documents – some of which were created on Macs, some on Windows, came up just fine in Office 2000, which is because I am not using the 2007 version that introduced a new file format that isn’t compatible with the older versions. Shame on you Microsoft – and I know from hearing from some of you how vexing that version could be.

The other thing I noticed is how important the browser is to today’s computing world, and if you aren’t willing to stay current with your browser, you quickly get into trouble with many Web sites. The coming of IE v7 is a good case in point, and I know there will be a lot of grief to be had on both ends – the people that adopt the new browser and find sites that don’t work in it, and the sites that want to use its new features and piss off the people that aren’t upgrading yet.

I will have more to report on this experiment as I spend more time back in NT land. And those of you that want to try this on your own, email me privately and I will give you more specific tips.

The Art of Product Management

I’ve known Rich Mironov through several jobs as a product manager and marketeer and he is one of the sharpest guys that I have had the pleasure of working with. Add a soupcon of humor and a delightful daughter and wife to the mix and we have had some fun times outside of work as well. His book called The Art of Product Management is out and if you are in the high tech product business you might want to get yourself a copy. He has lots of practical, succinct advice on how not to repeat the many mistakes of the past, and how to quickly tune up your product marketing and strategies for success. It is well worth the $22.

SecurePC may be too costly for what it delivers

Is $600 for a “netbook” too much to spend these days? Apparently so. I tried out the SecurePC from 01com.com and while a nice package, the price is a bit steep considering the competition.

The idea behind the SecurePC is a nifty one: put together a stripped-down version of Windows XP that just can connect to the Web and do nothing else. You do not have access to any local storage, so your PC can’t get infected from malicious Web sites or emails. You can’t download any programs. If it lives out on the Internet, you can run it – the usual Flash and Java add-ons come with the machine. Otherwise, forget it.

The notebook runs Intel’s Atom processor, so it is quiet, cool, and compact. The screen is bright but isn’t going to win an awards for size – it is a 10 inch diagonal and can run an external video monitor in the odd resolution of 1280×960 because of its form factor, I guess. And it comes with a solid state hard drive so there is one less moving part and heat source to worry about.

I liked the design and feel of the machine’s hard plastic case and they way it boots up almost instantly – it takes longer to find your wireless network than it does to bring up the overall system. The keyboard is a bit cramped for me, particularly the comma and period keys that are somewhat squished together. And it comes with three USB ports, although I am not sure what you would connect to them other than an external mouse. If you try to plug in a thumb drive, you aren’t going to get any files off it. The SecurePC does support USB 3G broadband modems, but I didn’t test any.

You can access network shares via the wired or wireless interfaces, but again, I am not sure what you would do with the files when you see them, unless you could run a auto-executing virtual machine session across the network. To get an idea of how stripped-down this OS is, you open up a rather sparse Control Panel. There isn’t much you can do, which I guess is good if you are getting this PC for grandma.

The disk storage is limited, and I had to play some games adjusting the virtual memory settings that would also allow enough room for temporary files: InTouch could spend some more time tweaking these setings. Another drawback is that you can’t upgrade your OS when Microsoft issues the inevitable patches since you have to wait for InTouch to release a new image of the machine’s innards.

If you are paranoid and can live without any applications – other than IE – than this is worth a look. It could be the perfect kitchen computer, or a second machine to do a lot of Web searching or Webmail on. The only real issue I have is the price. For $350, I can get a Dell, Acer, HP mini (or others here) that has a 10 inch screen and a full version of Windows and larger hard drives, and for the price of the Secure PC I can get a full-strength laptop with a 15 inch screen. And to make things more complicated, Radio Shack is selling netbooks for $99, plus the cost of a 3G broadband wireless plan from AT&T for $60 a month for a two-year contract. 

Announcing WebInformant.tv, sponsored screencast reviews

We have officially crossed over from the TV generation to the Internet generation: a recent study from Doubleclick Performics shows that more teens now spend more time in front of their PCs than their TVs. Call it the YouTube generation, blame it on last fall’s writer’s strike or too many channels and Nothing Is On, but let’s face it, the days of watching TV on our TVs seem so quaint now. And Google just came out with a new browser optimized for videos today.

I have decided to join the You Tube generation myself, and this summer I have begun to create a new kind of content for you, my beloved and loyal audience. Let me take a moment to indulge in some shameless self promotion, and also tell you a bit more about what you can see on my new venture called WebInformant.tv.

Most of my professional life has been spent explaining technologies that I use to various corporate IT audiences: first writing reports for the US government and then Megalopolis Insurance in their early attempts at supporting end-user computing. Later on I worked for Ziff, CMP, IDG, JupiterMedia and TechTarget in various capacities – starting magazines and editing Web sites and writing thousands of magazine articles and two books. It is a body of work that I am proud of, and still enjoy freelance work for all five of the major tech publishers. As cartoonist Lynda Barry said in a lecture last week, “A friend told me: You have managed to make a pretty decent living by just being yourself — well, I have tried and failed at everything else.” I know exactly how she feels.  

For several years I have been saying that missing from this corpus is video tutorials that show IT people how technology is actually being used, putting it through the typical paces that they would want and being able to see the screens and the logic flow of the product. I try to do this in all of my product reviews, and one of the reasons why I feel I have been successful is that I can capture this ethic and point of view very accurately in my articles.

So what is this new venture? WebInformant.tv is a series of sponsored video screencast product reviews. Sponsored means that the product’s vendor pays me to produce them. Right now it is just a one-person operation: I do everything from pick the products to write the scripts to produce the videos and promote and post them online. While this is a lot of work, it is very invigorating and thrilling too. I am looking at licensing, if that is the right word, this operation with other tech journalists whose work I respect, but ultimately this is my show. The vendors get simple up or down script approval, so the words you hear on these videos are really my own thoughts and opinions. Each video is about five minutes, and has things that I liked and didn’t like about each product.

The word screencast has been used by TechSmith’s Camtasia to describe PC screen recordings – what you are watching is not a movie of my mug, but as if the video camera was focused on the PC’s monitor and watching what I was doing with my mouse and menu clicks. You hear my voice narrating the video and giving context to what you are watching. I try to pack a lot of information into the five minutes, so you get a feel for the product and why you would or wouldn’t want to use it.

I am not the first person to do screencasts in a big way – Jon Udell was doing them for several years when he worked at Infoworld, and I appreciate his skills and leadership here. And there are other products that do this – Screenflow for the Mac and Adobe’s Captivate are just two of them. There are free services also at screencast-o-matic.com, uTIPu.com and freescreencast.com too. (You see, I just can’t help myself, have to go and compare tech.) I like Camtasia and have figured out most of its quirks to make it work for me.

The products that I review lend themselves to visual explanations: the first series that I have produced include SkyRecon’s StormShield and eEye’s Blink – both of which are endpoint security products that protect a Windows desktop from a series of attacks. There is also Secure Computing’s TrustedSource.org service, where you can look up the reputation of a particular domain and see what email servers have been sending messages on that domain’s behalf. And the products range from the free Timedriver.com appointment scheduling service to ones that cost several thousand dollars.

There are also very complex products that I have posted reviews: Servoy Developer is useful for building rapid Java applications that can run unchanged on both desktop and inside a Web browser. Altiris Workflow Solution from Symantec is great for automating just about any computing task and can leverage some very powerful data mining techniques. 

One of the interesting things that I am doing with WebInformant.tv is turning the model of content creation on its head. In the past, I wrote articles that were copyrighted by the publishers and posted on their Web sites only. With the screencasts, I want to distribute the content as widely as possible, as long as my branding and message remains intact. Once the video is posted on my site, it is also cross-posted on many other video sharing sites, including You Tube, Google Video, and others that specialize in how-to information. The vendors get their own copy that they can distribute as well as part of their marketing materials, or to augment their own Web sites, or whatever. Some of the vendors that I have begun to work with have created their own screencasts, so they clearly understand the power of this brave new world. By the way, the site Veoh.com does a nice job of cross-posting videos, definitely worth a closer look.

There are other reviews in the works, and I hope to be able to continue to enrich the site with new products for a long time to come, and grow my own video “channel” into a more vibrant place. And don’t worry: I’ll still be writing and editing, blogging and podcasting, and speaking around the world as always. This is just another arrow in my quiver, another way to enhance my brand, and something new to keep it fun.

Those of you that work or do PR for a vendor and want to sponsor me to review your products, send me a quick note and I can provide more specifics. And I welcome your feedback as always on how to improve the videos and make them more useful for your own situation. Enjoy watching Webinformant.tv! If you want to subscribe via RSS to keep updated when I add new ones, add this URL to your reader:

http://www.dailymotion.com/rss/videos/davidstrom/1

Boost your cell signal with Freedom Antenna

I am living in a cell dead zone temporarily and thanks to Arc’s Freedom Antenna, I can at least get a few more bars of signal strength and actually hear my callers. The antenna is about four inches high and has various cables to attach to a few different phones — you can search the company’s Web site and find out if yours is covered. In my case, the Razr has a small rubber plug on the back that pops out and can be connected. It is a bit cumbersome, and I still leave the antenna by the window to pick up the best signal, but the arrangement works. The antenna is less than $30 at major online retailers.

Running Windows on your Mac

I took a look at two books that offer plenty of guidance to run Windows as a guest OS on your Intel-based Mac. I have an aging G5 and it is getting time for an upgrade, and I am considering which of the four potential solutions to use when I get a new Mac: the Apple-supplied Boot Camp (requires 10.5 OS), Parallels, VMware Fusion, and Sun’s Virtual Box. The two books that are worthy of purchasing are:

  • Dwight Silverman’s book from Peachpit press ($35), which doesn’t cover Virtual Box but does a great job showing you the tradeoffs and settings for the other three solutions. He goes into lots of details for new Mac 10.5 users, which is very helpful. He also does a better job about describing how to run Vista as the secondary OS.
  • Joe Kissell’s Take Control book ($10 eBook download, paper $22), which includes the free open-source Virtual Box. He goes into more details about how to protect your Windows sessions from exploits (some of which are briefly mentioned in Dwight’s book), and more details on the various Boot Camp options.

Both have step-by-step installation and lots of tweaking tips to get the most out of your mixed mode Mac. Some things that I learned include:

  • Fusion supports dual-core CPUs and has less load, making it more attractive for processing-intensive Windows apps
  • Neither Parallels or Fusion support Firewire connections, and not all USB ones either.
  • Parallels comes with a free install of Kaspersky Anti-virus and has a nifty P2V utility to make virtual copies of running Windows configurations
  • Boot Camp is better for Windows gamers, since it isn’t running in a VM session

Both books are excellent resources, written by people who have experimented with the products and know what they are talking about, and filled with copious screen shots and practical advice.

Canary WiFi Spotter >> StarTech WiFi Detector

Sometimes I am attracted to the simplest products that do just one thing but do it well. For the past several weeks, I have been carrying around the Canary Wireless Digital Hotspotter HS10. Smaller than a PDA or an iPod, the little gadget detects WiFi signals and tells you several important things about each 802.11b and g access point that it finds: the channel, the SSID, overall radio signal strength and whether it is open or using encryption.Why bother with a $60 device when you can use your laptop to do almost the same thing? Several reasons. First, getting your laptop setup isn’t always easy or desirable, especially in areas that have marginal coverage. Second, the Canary unit can help you find the best spot to do your remote computing. Finally, showing the radio channels is helpful for setting up your own wireless network. In my case, I had four neighbors who were all using channel 6 for their networks. When I changed my own AP to another channel, I got better reception.The Canary unit worked both in radio rich environments, such as downtown San Francisco, and more rural and radio-poor areas too. In the former case, it will take a while to scroll through the many access points that it finds. And yes, you can dive into your computer’s wireless control panel and eventually find this information out without the unit. But why waste battery life and time when the Canary can do a better job?

Unfortunately, it is no longer for sale. Here is an alternative until Canary comes out with a new product.

Update 11/07: ThinkGeek sells a t-shirt that has a Wifi detector built-in. Cool, but it just displays signal strength and not the SSID or whether or not you have an open access point.

Update 2/08: StarTech.com sells its WiFi Detector, which is both a USB 11b/g wireless adapter with a small LCD panel that will show you which networks are in range. It sells for $75. You have to install drivers from a CD (and only for Windows) if you want it to work as a wireless adapter — a better solution would be to have a separate disk partition on the USB drive in case you lose the CD. The screen is small and if you are of a certain age, you will find the information hard to read. The adapter has its own connection and configuration software that is fairly easy to setup and works with all flavors of encrypted networks.