If you are looking for something better than Google Docs to work on a document or a presentation with a colleague, this column is for you. I will touch on four alternatives that are all better solutions and can give you ways to create your work product faster.
I have tried Google Docs in a few different situations, and they have been abject failures for different reasons: either the group of potential collaborators has never worked together before, or is too widely distributed geographically or organizationally to have developed any common work habits. As someone who has written two books with co-authors (along with countless magazine articles that get edited along the way), I can tell you the hardest part about collaboration isn’t the technical aspects — it is the human interactions and developing the various trusted relationships with your co-workers.
The other downside to using Google is that at its heart it still is serial workflow – I write my document and email a link so that you can continue. What we need are tools that can combine the immediacy of Instant Messaging with the viral power of social networks to help a group of content creators to get started to work together.
If your ultimate product is a document, start with the service Etherpad.com. You can bring up a common shared workspace inside your browser and multiple authors can add their comments in a chat window off to the side and compose on screen in real-time. Each author is given their own colored font to keep track of changes, and you can go back to particular versions quite easily. This service is great if you want to work with a writing partner on a proposal, say. Or if you have to assemble a final report from several sources and want all the authors to quickly converge on a series of recommendations.
But that solution is just for text. What about that bane of corporate life, PowerPoint slide decks? Here a service called SlideShare.net has a nifty solution. It goes beyond just sharing your slides by having a layer of social networking on top of things. You can add comments to individual slides, group a series of presentations together (such as all the sessions at a particular conference), add a voice narration track that can be synchronized to the slides, and more. All of this is of course available inside a Web browser. The speaker’s notes that accompany each slide is also displayed and indexed by the search engines, which can be a good or bad thing depending on how you use this feature. And you can embed your slides in your blog or broadcast them to your friends on various social networks. The downside is that your builds and transition effects are lost, so if your slides have a lot of these effects, you aren’t going to be too happy with the service. I also had issues with using Mac Safari for the uploads.
Moving on beyond slide decks is the service called drop.io for real-time collaboration that is based on an IM-style chat service. You bring up a browser and point to a common URL and off you go. You can drag and drop photos, documents, whatever and they show up in the common workspace, which you can view as a chat stream or a file directory. You can add comments, voice messages, even faxes (remember them?) to your shared workspace. When you have reached a point where you want others to review your work, you can send out a broadcast message to your Facebook or Twitter friends or gather everything up in a Zip file. For collections of files less than 100MB, the service is free.
Speaking of Twitter (isn’t everyone these days?), one final service that I will mention here is Yammer.com. If you think of this as a private social network discussion board that combines some of the notification and flexibility of Twitter with that of the traditional BBS’s, you got it. You can share files, have a tag cloud and a layer of search on top of everything too.
There are lots of other specialized collaboration tools – Collab.net’s free Subversion is useful for tracking software development projects, SocialText has several different tools and Clarizen.com’s fee-based project management tool is another one that I haven’t tried but seems useful in that area.
The nice thing about all of the services that I mention is that they all have free versions. With drop.io, if you want more room, you can get upgraded for $10 a gigabyte per year or if you want more management for $20 a month plan for 20 GB of storage. Yammer has a paid version if you want a managed private shared space that starts at $1 per person per month. Isn’t the Internet a grand experiment in free data processing? Nevertheless, it is great to be able to try something out risk-free. Do let me know of your own suggestions and what has worked and hasn’t for your collaborations. And if you want me to come speak to your company about these and other technologies, you can download my slide deck here (it is very much a work in progress) and see if it would be appropriate.
Stephen Kangas writes:
Interesting your comment below about Google Docs being a “serial workflow”.
I volunteer occasionally for the MIT Enterprise Forum (Northwest Chapter),
typically as a member of a dinner forum organizing committee. Recently, I
was a lead member of the committee putting together a dinner forum
(“Greenomics: Creating Profitable Businesses in a Clean & Green World”,
cooincidentally occuring tonight). Over the past few months, the 15+
members of the committee we collaborating in part using Google Docs (both
word processing and spreadsheet docs). It was my first experience with
Google Docs, and I was impressed. Since we were organizing a panel of
experts w/moderator on the topic, there was a long list of industry
advisors, candidate speakers & moderators, with multiple committee members
contacting & interviewing candidates and gathering research data, which we
tracked among us using Google Docs. Anyway, the thing that really impressed
me was the real-time update of the docs when multiple people worked on them.
There were dozen instances where I’d be working on one part of the doc while
changes were occuring in other areas of the doc. Opportunity for changing
things that other people were responsible for (we had a “name” associated
with each doc area or rows to mitigate this), similar to what some wikis
have problems with, but we didn’t have a problem with that. The only issue
we had was having the moderator making sure that everyone on the committee
was authorized to access & edit the docs. As a MS Office “Power User”, I’m
not comfortable replacing my client apps here with Google Docs…it’s pretty
crude feature-wise; but it served our organizing committee well, and it’s
free. Perhaps an indication of what Microsoft Office 14 Live will be like.